Review



anti rat nod1  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals anti rat nod1
    Constitutive expression of <t>NOD1</t> and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.
    Anti Rat Nod1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rat+nod1/NOD1+Antibody+(2A10)/pmc05055926-50-20-22
    Average 90 stars, based on 4 article reviews
    anti rat nod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Functional Roles of NOD1 in Odontoblasts on Dental Pulp Innate Immunity"

    Article Title: Functional Roles of NOD1 in Odontoblasts on Dental Pulp Innate Immunity

    Journal: BioMed Research International

    doi: 10.1155/2016/9325436

    Constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Produced, Cell Culture, Ab Array, Software, Control

    Expression and production of chemokines induced in KN-3 cells stimulated with NOD1 or NOD2 ligand. (a, b) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP-LL (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. (a) After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). (b) The concentrations of CINC-1, CINC-2, MCP-1, and CCL20 in the cell culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 4, 12, or 24 h. After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Values represent the means ± SDs from representative of four independent experiments and each experiment was performed in quadruplicate. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Expression and production of chemokines induced in KN-3 cells stimulated with NOD1 or NOD2 ligand. (a, b) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP-LL (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. (a) After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). (b) The concentrations of CINC-1, CINC-2, MCP-1, and CCL20 in the cell culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 4, 12, or 24 h. After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Values represent the means ± SDs from representative of four independent experiments and each experiment was performed in quadruplicate. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Isolation, Reverse Transcription, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Functional Roles of NOD1 in Odontoblasts on Dental Pulp Innate Immunity
    Article Snippet: SR11302 was purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). .. KN-3 cells fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were treated with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), incubated with anti-rat NOD1 (NOVUS BIOLOGICALS, Littleton, CO, USA), NOD2 (Abnova, Jhouzih St., Taipei, Taiwan) antibodies or their respective isotype-matched controls followed by reaction with fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). .. Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (EPICS XL; Beckman Coulter, Hialeah, FL, USA).



    Similar Products

    94
    HyTest 2pr8 cci 17 anti nod1 wb zen bioscience
    2pr8 Cci 17 Anti Nod1 Wb Zen Bioscience, supplied by HyTest, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rat+nod1/Anti-Proinsulin%2C+rat/pmc06796897__41422_2019_190_MOESM10_ESM-0-29-27
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2pr8 cci 17 anti nod1 wb zen bioscience - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Novus Biologicals anti rat nod1
    Constitutive expression of <t>NOD1</t> and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.
    Anti Rat Nod1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rat+nod1/NOD1+Antibody+(2A10)/pmc05055926-50-20-22
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rat nod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Journal: BioMed Research International

    Article Title: Functional Roles of NOD1 in Odontoblasts on Dental Pulp Innate Immunity

    doi: 10.1155/2016/9325436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in rat KN-3 cells and chemokine production in iE-DAP- and TNF- α -stimulated KN-3 cells. (a) The constitutive expression of NOD1 and NOD2 in KN-3 cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The results are representative of four different experiments demonstrating similar results. (b, c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. The detection of cytokines and chemokines produced in the cell culture supernatants was performed using a Rat Cytokine Antibody Array. (b) The results shown are representative images of two independent experiments with similar results. (c) Densitometric analysis of various chemokine production levels. Bars indicate the relative densitometric intensities after the values were normalized with both positive and negative controls and background using ImageJ software. In particular, positive controls were used to normalize the values from different membranes being compared. Values represent the means ± SDs of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Article Snippet: KN-3 cells fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were treated with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), incubated with anti-rat NOD1 (NOVUS BIOLOGICALS, Littleton, CO, USA), NOD2 (Abnova, Jhouzih St., Taipei, Taiwan) antibodies or their respective isotype-matched controls followed by reaction with fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Produced, Cell Culture, Ab Array, Software, Control

    Expression and production of chemokines induced in KN-3 cells stimulated with NOD1 or NOD2 ligand. (a, b) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP-LL (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. (a) After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). (b) The concentrations of CINC-1, CINC-2, MCP-1, and CCL20 in the cell culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 4, 12, or 24 h. After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Values represent the means ± SDs from representative of four independent experiments and each experiment was performed in quadruplicate. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Journal: BioMed Research International

    Article Title: Functional Roles of NOD1 in Odontoblasts on Dental Pulp Innate Immunity

    doi: 10.1155/2016/9325436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression and production of chemokines induced in KN-3 cells stimulated with NOD1 or NOD2 ligand. (a, b) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP (1 or 10 μ g mL −1 ), MDP-LL (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 24 h. (a) After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). (b) The concentrations of CINC-1, CINC-2, MCP-1, and CCL20 in the cell culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (c) KN-3 cells were stimulated with iE-DAP (10 μ g mL −1 ), iE-Lys (10 μ g mL −1 ), or TNF- α (0.01 μ g mL −1 ) for 4, 12, or 24 h. After stimulation, total RNA was isolated and mRNA expression levels of CINC-1, CINC-2 α , MCP-1, and CCL20 were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Values represent the means ± SDs from representative of four independent experiments and each experiment was performed in quadruplicate. Asterisks indicate significant differences ( ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01) versus nonstimulated control group.

    Article Snippet: KN-3 cells fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were treated with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), incubated with anti-rat NOD1 (NOVUS BIOLOGICALS, Littleton, CO, USA), NOD2 (Abnova, Jhouzih St., Taipei, Taiwan) antibodies or their respective isotype-matched controls followed by reaction with fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Isolation, Reverse Transcription, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control